Is mortgage debt that is discharged taxable as ordinary income?

This topic is a real bugaboo that seems to be attracting quite a bit of attention these days, what with foreclosures, short sales, bankruptcies and walk-aways in full bloom in the garden known as the mortgage meltdown.  Unfortunately, there seems to be more misinformation and urban myth floating around than good professional advice.  If you have any reservations at all about your status, don't make any assumptions about this subject without consulting a lawyer or accountant. 

The short answer is that Congress did pass the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, which does provide a lot of relief, and will probably benefit most of the folks that are most in need of the relief it provides.  But if you have investment property or a HELOC, keep reading. 
   
First of all, the general rule is that forgiven debt gives rise to "ordinary income" which is a taxable event ordinarily reported on IRS Form 1099.  Historically, there has been an exception that if the taxpayer is insolvent (which means only that their debts exceed their assets) then the forgiven debt is not taxable to the extent of the insolvency.  This means simply that if I owe $100 but my assets are only $80, then I am "insolvent" to the measurable tune of $20, and the amount of the forgiven debt that is not taxable would be limited to that $20.   The filing of a bankruptcy petition gives rise to a "presumption of insolvency" which usually is the end of the issue and the taxpayer won't be taxed on the forgiven debt.  Absent a bankruptcy petition, you would normally have to prove the insolvency to the IRS in order to avoid the tax.

Continue Reading...

2008 Real Estate Connect to be held in San Francisco

The 2008 Real Estate Connect jamboree will be held this year in San Francisco.  The dates are July 23 to the 25th, at the old world glamorous Palace Hotel. 

The event is described on the Inman News website as follows:

Real Estate Connect San Francisco 2008 is Inman News 12th annual gathering; where the leaders in real estate, finance and technology come to promote change and innovation within the industry. Big name speakers, topic-driven panels and practical workshops combine to provide attendees with the tools and techniques they need to compete in a rapidly changing landscape.

Since it's in my own backyard, maybe I'll go and see what all the buzz is about. 


What sorts of "reasonable accommodations" must a landlord make to avoid a charge of discrimation on the basis of a physical disability?

My compliments and gratitude to Lincoln Hobbs, Esq., author of the blog Utah Condo Law for alerting me to an online publication of the US Dept. of Justice's ("DOJ") March 5, 2008 Joint Statement of the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") and DOJ on the Fair Housing Act and what sorts of structural modifications may be required on the part of landlords in order to comply with that statute. 

Lincoln goes so far as to suggest that the pub may be so groundbreaking as to be required reading for several categories of real estate professionals.  It may be.  But I'd suggest watching Lincoln's blog for his spin on the subject.   He indicates that he's going to be extracting and digesting the nuggets for his readers, who, I guess, are mostly Utah HOA's.  Since it's a Federal statute, the rules in Utah will be mostly identical for those in the Bay Area or elsewhere in California.


Project Lifeline: Real help...or a bigger shovel for a deeper hole?

In what has got to be one of the most absurd cases of political window dressing from an administration renowned for its absurd political window dressing, someone very clever inside the Beltway, together with six of the nation's largest mortgage lenders, has come up with what they're calling "Project Lifeline."  As a solution to a problem it's about on par with putting a band aid on a severed limb. But as an act of political theater? I can't help but think "Karl Rove." Anything so useless, so hollowly symbolic, so hostile to the lower middle class...and so appealingly named, has gotta have his finger prints all over it. For two analyses of this proposed legislation, here's how it was reported by Business Week, and here's kind of a wonkish economist's analysis of this blunderbuss. And these critics aren't even part of the liberal media.

For a discussion of why this is more comedy then remedy, read on...

Continue Reading...